User talk:Trade

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trade!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Cosplay of StarCraft

Hello! Is there a reason why you moved all the cosplay of StarCraft in Category:Unidentified cosplay of StarCraft, including the ones that are identified? Syrio posso aiutare? 11:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

The category are for images that are either unidentified or are otherwise not placed in their appropriate category structure. Even if the first is done, the later is not. --Trade (talk) 09:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

File:20201006 Folketinget Plakat port IMG 3285 (50430913282).jpg

File:20201006 Folketinget Plakat port IMG 3285 (50430913282).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Rei_Ayanami_plushies

Rei Ayanami plushies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Anya_Forger_plushies

Anya Forger plushies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Pochita_plushies

Pochita plushies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Plushies,_dolls_or_toys_based_on_fictional_characters

Plushies, dolls or toys based on fictional characters has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Structured data redundancies

Hi Trade! For edits like this, is there a way to ensure we're not adding redundant structured data? That item was already tagged with wikidata:Q2797513, making the addition of wikidata:Q11639 perhaps a redundant. (I say "perhaps" because Q2797513 seems to not have separated out the dance and associated music.) Sdkb ^talk 19:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Other than removing "dance" from the entire category, i can't think of any way Trade (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

If there's no way to do that, then the task probably needs manual review. Sdkb ^talk 02:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Could probably solve it if there was a way to search for all photos in that category that features Q2797513 Trade (talk) 02:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm not concerned about that specific edit (which is easily fixed manually), though, but rather about the broader issue it illustrates. And I don't see how what you propose could scale. What we need is for AC/DC to issue a warning when you try to add a depicts statement to a photo that already has a depicts statement for an item that is an instance or a subclass of the item being added. Pinging Lucas Werkmeister as maintainer. Sdkb ^talk 02:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Hm. I think this might be possible to do relatively efficiently – get all the subclasses / instances of the items being added once, and then check each existing item’s statements against that (ACDC already fetches the existing statements so it can check whether they need to be re-added or not). But I wonder how the gadget can know when this is appropriate or not. It’s probably a good idea to do it for properties like depicts (P180), but I’m less sure about other ones, like significant event (P793) or copyright license (P275)… what do you think? (Maybe this would also be worth moving to Help talk:Gadget-ACDC.) Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I think "depicts" would be a good start, and we could expand from there. (And happy for this discussion to be moved, or a {{Please see}} to be put there; anywhere is fine so long as we don't create forks.) Sdkb ^talk 16:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)