Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections
Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP
This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reportswikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergencywikimedia.org. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Vandalism [ ] |
User problems [ ] |
Blocks and protections [ ] |
Other [ ] |
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.
|
Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.
|
Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.
|
Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS. |
Archives | |||
111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 |
95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
| ||
Note
- For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
- Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
- Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (
~~~~
), which translates into a signature and a time stamp. - Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s).
{{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}}
is available for this. - Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
I ask you to remove the protection from the file early, as this makes it impossible to apply for the removal of an image that is not in the specified source and that violates copyright. A better replacement has already been uploaded under a free license and can be used in all language sections of Wikipedia to illustrate the facts stated in the article. Thank you! — ArtSmir (talk) 09:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done Nominated for deletion. Please further expand your arguments there, @ArtSmir Bedivere (talk) 15:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- thx sir. — ArtSmir (talk) 15:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please do add your opinion there. To date you have not, @ArtSmir. Bedivere (talk) 23:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere, give me some time. I will provide irrefutable evidence that this file is clearly infringing. — ArtSmir (talk) 07:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere. It’s a pity that my answer here, with a promise to provide convincing counterarguments, appeared literally a few minutes after your quick summing up of this nomination. Because of this, I will be forced to try again to nominate the file for deletion, since I was not given enough time to respond in the first discussion. Thank you! — ArtSmir (talk) 07:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- You have not provided here a convincing argument to refute the file is not under the stated license. The archived version provided by the uploader is enough for me. You can renominate, anyway. Bedivere (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere. Can I do this through the built-in nomination gadget if the file is included in cascade protection by the bot? — ArtSmir (talk) 16:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think not because it is protected. However, I fail to see why should this be deleted, since it's been already proved the file is free to use. If you can expand your intentions here, I will reopen the discussion for you. Bedivere (talk) 18:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere. This was proven exclusively in a situation where only the party that uploaded the file had time to respond. And naturally, this was a position opposite to my position, even despite the obvious violations, which for some reason no one wants to see. I have my arguments ready, and I am ready to use them if you reopen the nomination for deleted. And I ask you not to rush into summing up, but to give other experienced colleagues the opportunity to consider this issue impartially, paying attention to all the details of the dispute. — ArtSmir (talk) 12:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @ArtSmir: Where is the better replacement? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.. I was going to post this in my counterargument, but if you want to see the replacement now, I'll show it here: File:Elimination of the consequences of a fire in "Crocus City Hall" (March 25, 2024).jpg. — ArtSmir (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- OTOH, the closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Crocus City Hall amphitheater after terrorist attack (2024).jpg does look rushed. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @ArtSmir: Where is the better replacement? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere. This was proven exclusively in a situation where only the party that uploaded the file had time to respond. And naturally, this was a position opposite to my position, even despite the obvious violations, which for some reason no one wants to see. I have my arguments ready, and I am ready to use them if you reopen the nomination for deleted. And I ask you not to rush into summing up, but to give other experienced colleagues the opportunity to consider this issue impartially, paying attention to all the details of the dispute. — ArtSmir (talk) 12:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think not because it is protected. However, I fail to see why should this be deleted, since it's been already proved the file is free to use. If you can expand your intentions here, I will reopen the discussion for you. Bedivere (talk) 18:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere. Can I do this through the built-in nomination gadget if the file is included in cascade protection by the bot? — ArtSmir (talk) 16:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- You have not provided here a convincing argument to refute the file is not under the stated license. The archived version provided by the uploader is enough for me. You can renominate, anyway. Bedivere (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please do add your opinion there. To date you have not, @ArtSmir. Bedivere (talk) 23:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- thx sir. — ArtSmir (talk) 15:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection request for template
Hi, please could someone semi-protect Template:Portal box and Template:Portal box/styles.css. I'm using them in a rewrite of Commons:Community portal to make it more accessible and mobile-friendly (viewable at Commons:Community portal/sandbox), and since the portal is semi-protected the templates should be too. the wub "?!" 14:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done Protection of Template:Portal box and Template:Portal box/styles.css now match protection at Commons:Community portal. —RP88 (talk) 15:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
It may seen unfair to use a final warning from 8 years ago as a reason to block, but if its about an image of the same exact person as most of the other ones, and tahis uploader was able to figure out how to use the VRT system at least once (File:Fabio Marra 2.jpg), that's pretty bad Mach61 (talk) 19:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not done Your point is well taken, but I think 8 years is too long. I've issued another final warning and deleted the new file File:Fabiomarra.jpg, as it is very likely a copyright violation. Carrozzone, feel free to request undeletion via COM:VRT. If you do so this image will be restored automatically if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. —RP88 (talk) 22:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Alisu faz o L
Alisu faz o L (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Uploading copyright violations after previous block. – Pbrks (t • c) 13:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Brother, I sent the image under guidelines 3.0, what do you mean this is violating rights? the original image is on the same guideline, I don't understand you Alisu faz o L (talk) 15:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Alisu faz o L: In one of your messages on your talk page, you confirm that you uploaded someone else's image and didn't know the exact license but put CC 3.0 license. This amounts to copyright violation. You are free to upload your own work that is under our scope, and if you are uploading someone else's work, you would need to faciliate COM:VRT permissions. This means that the author/original copyrights holder needs to release the image under a compatible free license. Just that an image is available is elsewhere does not make it free. ─ Aafī (talk) 20:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- but the 3.0 license is not there to reuse the image, as long as it uses the same license? I can't go back to the creator of the images I upload because they are very big companies. Alisu faz o L (talk) 02:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Alisu faz o L: In one of your messages on your talk page, you confirm that you uploaded someone else's image and didn't know the exact license but put CC 3.0 license. This amounts to copyright violation. You are free to upload your own work that is under our scope, and if you are uploading someone else's work, you would need to faciliate COM:VRT permissions. This means that the author/original copyrights holder needs to release the image under a compatible free license. Just that an image is available is elsewhere does not make it free. ─ Aafī (talk) 20:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a month (2nd block), everything's already deleted. Yann (talk) 09:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Ikeya hikaru
- Ikeya hikaru (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Although receiving many copyvio warns and blocks, this user restored copyvio ones and restarted mass-uploading copyvio Youtube screenshots. (File:長尾寧音3.jpg, File:Nagao_Shizune_for_Aikatsu-Planet.jpg) Netora (talk) 15:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done indef. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Shreeharisab
- Shreeharisab (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Comprehension issue, repeatedly reuploading the same non-free Instagram photo after a warning. No other edits. Belbury (talk) 09:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a week, file deleted. Yann (talk) 09:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Hhhlx
- Hhhlx (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Still uploading copyvios after a final warning. Belbury (talk) 13:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a week, copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Block request for User:Yony Orlando Calanche
Yony Orlando Calanche (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
An account solely for advertising purposes on the User:Yony Orlando Calanche page. Alachuckthebuck (talk) 16:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done User warned, everything's deleted. Yann (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Warning wasn't sufficient, so blocked. Yann (talk) 11:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Protection problems 2024-04-03 "No globals"
- Please edit Module:WikidataIB and remove the line
-- Module:No globals
- Please unprotect Module:No globals. It's disused. outdated trans count, now at ca 2'600'000, slowly sinking
Block request for User:Cenasone
Cenasone (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) An account solely for the purpose of vandalism on the File:Male Human body.png page. All the best - Chuck Talk 03:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done. All contributions are deleted. No activity after your warning, so currently block is not needed. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Misora Koike / スカイ・シー
- Misora Koike (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- スカイ・シー (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Abusing multiple accounts, again. Previous sockpuppets were KM611 (talk · contribs) and KoiMiSo (talk · contribs). All of these four accounts have been indefinitely blocked at jawiki. See also ja:Special:Contributions/スカイ・シー. Thanks. フランベ (talk) 11:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @フランベ: I reported them via m:srg. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Both blocked. Yann (talk) 11:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Akeem Quadri
- Akeem Quadri (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Obvious sock of blocked cross-wiki spammer Soladoye Kerimot (talk · contribs). Uploading the same deleted files. Marbletan (talk) 12:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Blocked, files deleted. Yann (talk) 13:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Should we forward to the stewards?
- All the best - Chuck Talk 00:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Alachuckthebuck: Done thanks to @EPIC! — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Block request for User:Indianharddick
Indianharddick (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) Harassing or defamatory username Waqar💬 20:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for COM:IU. Files deleted. Yann (talk) 20:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Waqar💬 20:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Requested block for User:Ishakat55
Ishakat55 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
User has long history of copyright violation and at least 5 instances of uploading hoax logos of children's television stations and television programs. A handful of additional deletion requests of possible hoax images are pending. Previously blocked in Dec 2003 for similar issues. William Graham 20:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for three months (3rd block). ─ Aafī (talk) 23:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Azeez shodcash
- Azeez shodcash (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Obvious sock of blocked cross-wiki spammer Soladoye Kerimot (talk · contribs). Uploading the same deleted files. See also Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#Akeem_Quadri above. Marbletan (talk) 12:52, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done Already globally locked. All files deleted. Yann (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
MarcBgd
MarcBgd (talk · contribs) is already blocked on en wiki for repeated copyright violations. There are multiple warnings on the user's commons talk page. They apparently do not understand copyright and so unfortunately should be blocked to prevent further infringement. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done. One week block. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)